Cases 101 - 110 of 133
BROWN v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00483
Plaintiff:
FRANK BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARQUEZ v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00500
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL MARQUEZ
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00505
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RILEY
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIMINEZ v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00495
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JIMINEZ
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00501
Plaintiff:
LAMONT MATTHEWS
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00489
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GIBBS
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDD v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
HOWARD REDD
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZUBERI v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00511
Plaintiff:
RAMAZAN ZUBERI
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00484
Plaintiff:
THEODORE CLARK
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARCHITTO v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2007cv00499
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARCHITTO
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, WILLIAM PLANTIER, GRACE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
