Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 117
In Re: Wellbutrin XL ANTITRUST, et al
as 12-8039
Not Party - Amicus Curiae: In re: WELLBUTRIN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Respondent: INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS and PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 572, Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant - Petitioner: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, f/k/a Biovail Corporation, VALEANT INTERNATIONAL BARBADOS, f/k/a Biovail Laboratories International SRL and successor to Biovail Laboratories, Inc. and GLAXOSMITH KLINE, f/k/a SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline Plc
Not Party - Respondent: IBEW-NECA LOCAL 505
Movant - Respondent: AETNA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA, INC
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., et al
as 12-15760
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: SEAN HULL
Defendant - Appellee: CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., ("Chunghwa PT") is a Taiwanese company and CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD., ("Chunghwa Malaysia") is a Malaysian company
In re Air Cargo Shipping Servi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-5464
Debtor: In re: Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-888, ABM International, Inc. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-706 Fleurchem, Inc. v. British Airways et al and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-1011, JCK Industries, Inc. v. British Airways, PLC et al, One or more Plaintiff(s) in 06-cv-3001, Maria's Collections, Inc. v. Air France-KLM et al and others
Defendant: One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-984, Spraying Systems CO. v. Ace Aviation Holdings, Inc. et al., One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-997, Spitz v. Air France-KLM et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-3184, Printing Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG and others
Defendant - Appellee: One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-827, Helen's Wooden Crafting Co. v. Air Canada et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-981, Global Apparels Kenya (EPZ), Ltd. v. British Airways PLC et al, One or more Defendant(s) in 06-cv-3185, Niagara Frontier Distribution, Inc. v. Air France ADS and others
Direct Purchaser Class, et al v. Foamex Innovations, Inc.
as 11-4118
: In re: POLYURETHANE FOAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS and PIAZZA'S CARPET & TILE SHOP, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: FOAMEX INNOVATIONS, INC.
In re: Publication Paper We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-101
Plaintiff: Charles J. Gardella, Jr., o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Technolith Inc, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as FCP Webindery Inc., Larry Weiss, o/b/o himself & all others similarly situated formerly doing business as Forms Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated and Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated
Defendant: International Paper Co., Meadwestvaco Corp., Norske Skogindustrier ASA and others
Defendant - Appellee: Stora Enso Oyj and Stora Enso North America Corp.
In Re: Publication Paper
as 11-101
Plaintiff: Chris Young, Thomas Muldoon, Indirect Purchaser Plaintiff, Donna McCann, o/b/o herself & all others similarly situated and others
Defendant: Bowater, Inc., Metsalitto Group, Norske Skog (USA) Holdings Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Stora Enso North America Corp. and Stora Enso Oyj
Plaintiff / Appellant: Digital Color Imaging, Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated, Austin Printing Co. Inc., individually and o/b/o all others similarly situated and Acorn/Parliament Paper Inc., o/b/o itself & all others similarly situated
In re: Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2010md02196
Plaintiff: Direct Action Plaintiff(s), Direct Purchaser Class, Indirect Purchaser Class and others
Defendant: Defendants Liaison Counsel
Petitioner: Arsenal Capital Partners
Special Master: David Rosenblum Cohen
Intervenor: The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff: HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff: AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master: STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Minn-Chem, Incorporated, et al v. Agrium Incorporated, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1712
Plaintiff - Appellee: MINN-CHEM, INCORPORATED, GAGE'S FERTILIZER & GRAIN, INCORPORATED, INDIRECT PURCHASERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: AGRIUM INCORPORATED, MOSAIC COMPANY, POTASH CORPORATION OF SASKATCHEWAN, INCORPORATED and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?