Cases 101 - 110 of 133
HASKINS v. USA
as 1:2010cv00640
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LEROY HASKINS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conant v. Johns
as 5:2010hc02110
Petitioner:
Leroy Lemont Conant
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Johns
as 5:2010hc02066
Petitioner:
Leroy Miller
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joyner v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00041
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eddie Leroy Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2010cv00039
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eddie Leroy Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOONE v. KABBANI
as 1:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
LEROY WAYNE BOONE
Defendant:
NAJIB KABBANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
North American Savings Bank, FSB v. Henderson Holdings Company et al
as 3:2009mc00198
Plaintiff:
North American Savings Bank, FSB and North American Savings Bank, FSB
ThirdParty Defendant:
Tara Sherbert, Community Commercial Development, LLC, Capitol Entertainment, LLC and others
Defendant:
Henderson Holdings Company, LLC, Lavetta B Henderson, Melvin L. Henderson and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Ingram Walters, Ingram Walters, Erin Walters and others
SHANKLE v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
LEROY TED SHANKLE
Defendant:
J. DOUGLAS HENDERSON, BRANDON S. GOLDSBOROUGH and CHARLES WANNAMAKER, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heiskell et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leroy Heiskell and Rebecca J. Heiskell
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Birmingham, Jr. et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Leroy Albert Birmingham, Jr. and Betty L. Birmingham
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
