Cases 101 - 110 of 318
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02720
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MAIN STREET AMERICA ASSURANCE COMPANY v. FRIEL PLASTERING & STUCCO, INC.
as 2:2019cv01868
Plaintiff:
MAIN STREET AMERICA ASSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRIEL PLASTERING & STUCCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAIN
as 2:2019cv00253
Defendant:
BETTY J. MAIN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
PAPA v. DIAMANDI et al
as 2:2019cv00846
Defendant:
MIHAI DIAMANDI, MAIN LINE HEALTH PARTNERS, DAVID A. THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH F. PAPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCGUCKIN et al v. GLADFELTER et al
as 2:2019cv00641
Defendant:
DR. RACHEL LEVINE and GARRISON GLADFELTER, JR.
Plaintiff:
MAIN LINE VASCULAR INSTITUTE, LLC, AMBULATORY CARE SPECIALISTS OF CRANBERRY, LLC, LEHIGH VALLEY VASCULAR INSTITUTE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
PEGGY BARNS, DAVID CLOSE, REBECCA REIFER and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE PRATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LANE v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2019cv00290
Defendant:
ELIZABETH SNYDER REAL ESTATE, LLC, MAIN STREET FINANCIAL PARTNERS, LLC and ELIZABETH SNYDER
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LANE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ZLATKEVICH v. MAIN US POST OFFICE
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
MAIN US POST OFFICE
Plaintiff:
LEV ZLATKEVICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
