Cases 101 - 110 of 139
Wright v. U.S. Military Techno & Innercity Satellite Div et al
as 2:2010cv02941
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Military Techno & Innercity Satellite Div, Louise Patterson, Theola Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murff v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv02930
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murff
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Private Corporation, Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. TDI Terraplan Development, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02908
Plaintiff:
Jamie G Ray
Defendant:
TDI Terraplan Development, Inc. , Regal Auto Wash XXVI Associates, LLC , Eva Sperber-Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Porter v. GMAC Homecomings Financials Network et al
as 2:2010cv02858
Plaintiff:
Lolina Porter
Defendant:
GMAC Homecomings Financials Network, Aurora Loan Services LLC , Genworth Financial and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Lowe v. Gentry et al
as 3:2010cv00857
Plaintiff:
Rufus Lowe
Defendant:
Sharon Dixon Gentry, Metropolitan Government , The Metropolitan Nashville Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porter v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv02477
Petitioner:
Vincent Porter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Porter v. Progressive Directions, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00585
Plaintiff:
William A. Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Directions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Alcoa High School et al
as 3:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Powell
Defendant:
Alcoa High School and Scott Porter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Porter v. Lu, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Andrew Porter
Defendant:
Lu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
