Cases 101 - 110 of 390
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Stevens v. US Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv02232
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, USCIS, US Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stevens
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
National Immigrant Justice, et al v. EOIR, et al
as 21-5063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project, National Immigrant Justice Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review, Jean King, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as the Attorney General and others
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff:
J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv10486
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Franklin Lopez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-1259
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Jean King, Acting Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel Martinez Lopez, all others similarly situated and Franklin Lopez, all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00296
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Centro Legal de la Raza et al v. Executive Office for Immigration Review et al
as 3:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
Tahirih Justice Center, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Centro Legal de la Raza and others
Amicus Curiae:
Alameda County Public Defender's Office, University of California, Los Angeles Immigration Law Clinic, Former Immigration Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-319
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
