Cases 101 - 110 of 55,839
Eiselin v. USCIS San Diego
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Louis Eiselin
Defendant:
USCIS San Diego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Conrriquez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Monica Conrriquez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc Notice of Removal - Other Contract
Cocroft v. EquipmentShare.com Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dion Cocroft
Defendant:
EquipmentShare.com Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wareka v. Radiance Wellness and Beauty et al
as 3:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
Radiance Wellness and Beauty, Kim Knox and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Diaz v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Pricilla Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
