Cases 111 - 120 of 733
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Abdullah-Malik v. Cathy et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Eddie Cathy, FNU Rogers, FNU Pursor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rusty Anderson
Defendant:
Gene Davidson, 12 or More Grand Jurors, FNU Etters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and Cathy Beam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hanniford v. City of Poughkeepsie et al
as 7:2021cv10359
Plaintiff:
Dean Hanniford
Defendant:
City of Poughkeepsie, Sergeant Terrance Beam and Police Officer Edward Fenichel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murillo v. Thich et al
as 3:2021cv09973
Plaintiff:
R. Mona Murillo
Defendant:
John Thich, E. Beam, Veronica Lomeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apex Beam Technologies LLC v. OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Apex Beam Technologies LLC
Defendant:
OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Apex Beam Technologies LLC v. ZTE Corporation
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Apex Beam Technologies LLC
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
BEAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BEAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
