Cases 111 - 120 of 197
Burger King Corporation v. Rumsey et al
as 1:2011cv21669
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Walter T Rumsey, Charles Mazzocchi and Consumer Food Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2011cv80468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Burger King Corporation v. Novak et al
as 1:2011cv21448
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Michael G Novak and American Dining Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. V & J Foods of Michigan, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv21224
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
V & J Foods of Michigan, Inc., Valerie Daniels-Carter, V & J Foods of Michigan II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burger King Corporation v. Jimcamm Enterprises Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv21123
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Jimcamm Enterprises Ltd. and Mark Cammilleri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 8:2011cv00642
Plaintiff:
Salomon Ramos , Jorge Ramos and Miguel Ramos
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burger King Corporation v. Balantzian
as 1:2011cv21011
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Linda D Balantzian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burger King Corporation v. Eastman Food Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv20502
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Eastman Food Services, Inc. and Robert E Eastman, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. Hultgren et al
as 1:2011cv20432
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Bruce P. Hultgren and Hult of Bloomington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burger King Corporation v. Shariff
as 1:2011cv20362
Plaintiff:
Burger King Corporation
Defendant:
Mehboob Shariff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
