Cases 111 - 120 of 497
David Meyers v. Muriel Pitney
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MURIEL-THERESA PITNEY, Clerk, DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia, BETH COBELL, Sussex I State Prison Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meyers v. Petersburg Circuit Court et al
as 2:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Petersburg Circuit Court, Martin Bryant, Sean Vancampen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden, DEAN LOCKLEAR, Associate Warden, Scotland Correctional Institute, MS. S. BRADDY, Case Manager, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
David Meyers v. Mr. Jacobs
as 22-6898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. JACOBS, Chief Warden of Scotland Correctional Institute, MR. DEAN LOCKLEAR, Assistant Warden of Scotland Correctional Institute, DIRECTOR TODD E. ISHEE and others
Meyer v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 4:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
John David Meyer and Katherine Sterett
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Hyundai Translead, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 ml Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle Prod Liability
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6789
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
