Cases 111 - 120 of 396
HAZELWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv99769
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT HAZELWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAZELWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97154
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HAZELWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAZELWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93841
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA HAZELWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAZELWOOD JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv88201
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAJOR HAZELWOOD JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America ex rel. et al Nix v. United Biologics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
United Biologics, LLC doing business as United Allergy Services formerly known as United Allergy Labs, United Allergy Labs, Decatur Pediatric Group, P.A. and others
Petitioner:
Bothwell Law Group, P.C., Mike Bothwell and Bothwell Bracker P.C.
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Colorado ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
HAZELWOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv16273
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY HAZELWOOD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazelwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
David Allen Hazelwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark et al v. Stone et al
as 4:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Douglas Hazelwood, Bernadette Stone, Adam Meier and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Clark and Genetta Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
