Cases 111 - 120 of 151
BANKS v. HICKTON et al
as 2:2015mc00885
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
DAVID HICKTON, ROBERT CESSAR, JUDGE MARK HORNAK and others
Jeff Williamson v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeff H. Williamson
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Obama, Loretta E. Lynch, Michael E. Horowitz and others
VASATURO v. PETERKA et al
as 1:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
DARREN R. VASATURO
Defendant:
SASHA PETERKA, JAMIE ROUGHAN, GLENN PAQUETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David A Larson v. Loretta Lynch et al
as 5:2015cv02106
Defendant:
John Brennan, John Brennan, Does and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Larson
David A Larson v. Loretta Lynch et al
as 5:2015cv01786
Defendant:
John Brennan, John Brennan, Does and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Larson
BANKS v. FISHBACK et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SEAN LANGFORD, JAMES COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2005cv05442
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wise and Michael Brown
Defendant:
Raymond W. Kelly, Barry M. Buzzetti, 1-50 John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00490
Plaintiff:
JEFF H. WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHAEL HOROWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Comey et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Tori Stewart
Defendant:
James Comey , Michael S. Rogers , John Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Saunders v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 14-4643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR JACK MARKELL, FORMER COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE and others
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CONNECTIONS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, DR. LAURIE SPRAGA, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
