Cases 111 - 120 of 135
Baggett et al v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv40224
Plaintiff:
Michael Baggett
Defendant:
Carolyn Murphy, Deval L. Patrick, Timothy P. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Conway et al
as 3:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
VIBO Corporation, Inc., VIBO Corporation, Inc. and VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Conway, Troy King, Talis J. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Azubuko v. Doherty et al
as 1:2008cv11784
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Michael Doherty, Paul Burns, Stephen S. Abany and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCullen, et al v. Coakley
as 08-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEANOR MCCULLEN, JEAN BLACKBURN ZARRELLA, CARMEL FARRELL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
:
, , and others
Huang v. Huang, et al
as 08-2233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERA W. HUANG
Plaintiff:
YUN CHIOU CHENG and JOAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
MENG YIH HUANG, JUDGE EDWARD J. ROCKETT, HONORABLE SEAN M. DUNPHY and others
Rosa v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2008cv11487
Petitioner:
Israel Rosa
Respondent:
Thomas Dickhaut and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Ryan et al
as 3:2008cv30175
Plaintiff:
Jamarle Hill
Defendant:
Charles V. Ryan, Edward A. Flynn, William J. Fitchet and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sadur v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2008cv11280
Plaintiff:
Jason Sadur
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Azubuko v. Doherty et al
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Defendant:
Michael Doherty, Paul Burns, Stephen S. Abany and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grant v. Coakley
as 3:2008cv30120
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Grant
Respondent:
Martha Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
