Cases 111 - 120 of 195
Dominguez v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01108
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Dominguez
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kline v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jacob Kline
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00978
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Delgado v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00676
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joey Delgado
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, GEO Group, Inc., Lea County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00684
Plaintiff:
Celso K Stephens
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, FNU LNU, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega v. Fourth Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00473
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Ortega
Respondent:
Fourth Judicial District Court, New Mexico Department of Corrections and New Mexico Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzales v. N.M. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00425
Plaintiff:
Roddy Gonzales
Defendant:
N.M. Department of Corrections and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haceesa v. Wrigley et al
as 2:2015cv00420
Petitioner:
Howard Haceesa
Respondent:
Jeff Wrigley and New Mexico Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
