Cases 111 - 120 of 197
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Brothers v. Ward et al
as 5:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joan Brothers
Defendant:
Tom L Ward, Jim J Brewer, Everett R Dobson and others
Movant:
Paul Elliot
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Elliot v. Ward et al
as 5:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Paul Elliot
Defendant:
Tom L Ward , Jim J Brewer , Everett R Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Depuy v. Ward et al
as 5:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Deborah Depuy
Defendant:
Tom L Ward , Jim J Brewer , Everett R Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Varkey et al v. Clark Road Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Toms Varkey and Annie Joshua
Defendant:
Clark Road Transport, Inc. and Gregory Bonhomme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Carbone v. Sandridge Energy Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Louis Carbone
Defendant:
Sandridge Energy Inc, Tom L Ward, James D Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Levine v. Ward et al
as 5:2012cv01404
Plaintiff:
Arthur I Levine
Defendant:
Tom L Ward, Jim J Brewer, Everett R Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Prather v. Lee et al
as 5:2012cv01346
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Tom Lee and Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Lee et al
as 5:2012cv01347
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Tom Lee and Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Lee et al
as 5:2012cv01349
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Tom Lee and Brad Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
