Cases 111 - 120 of 67,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Das et al v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank et al
as 1:2024cv10931
Plaintiff:
Abhijit Das, Mitra Das, Dr Mukti Das and others
Defendant:
Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank, David Wallace, John Pratt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 16CR40026
as 4:2024cv40055
Petitioner:
Dusten James Miller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. EDA CARPENTRY INC
as 1:2024cv10928
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
EDA CARPENTRY INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Kline v. Primis Bank
as 1:2024cv10929
Plaintiff:
Robert Kline
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
McArdle v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv40054
Plaintiff:
Timothy McArdle
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Desmond v. Wallin
as 1:2024cv10411
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Bibeau v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10911
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Bibeau
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lykins v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10922
Plaintiff:
Janice Lykins
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solis v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10919
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Solis
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
