Cases 111 - 120 of 425,614
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Holmes v. Harry et al
as 4:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
James Franklin Holmes
Respondent:
Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00658
Petitioner:
Christian Dior Womack
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bender v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bender
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00843
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
READING COLLISION CENTER v. GONZALEZ
as 5:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
READING COLLISION CENTER
Defendant:
SANDRA GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
WEBB v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
JILL E. RANGOS, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CALI v. THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE MARY CALI and MARY GERELYN BLANEY
Defendant:
THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
