Cases 111 - 120 of 84,868
TROUPE v. SUNDAY et al
as 2:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN TROUPE
Defendant:
SGT SUNDAY, SUPERINTENDENT ORLANDO HARPER and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Fabian Alexander Cook
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv04857
Petitioner:
ALI HILL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WILLIAMS v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
LAQUN RASHEED WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOE TERRA, S. GRADY, LT. SPAGNOLLETI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KUBS v. GANNON
as 2:2024cv04676
Petitioner:
KYLE-JOSEPH KUBS
Respondent:
JAMES GANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMAD v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04724
Petitioner:
RAAJHAUN MUHAMMAD
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. EICKHOFF et al
as 1:2024cv04644
Plaintiff:
MARLON D. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL EICKHOFF and SGT. GOVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, DR. FARRAH AHMEDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
