Cases 111 - 120 of 5,642
Hodson v. United States of America, The
as 0:2023cv03569
Plaintiff:
David Joseph Hodson
Defendant:
The United States of America and United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Stenseth
as 0:2023cv03881
Petitioner:
Dequarn Markeyth Bell
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Doe et al
as 0:2023cv03750
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe and James Bets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haji v. USA
as 0:2023cv03905
Petitioner:
Hashim Salah Haji
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ward v. King
as 0:2023cv03327
Petitioner:
Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. USA
as 0:2023cv03889
Petitioner:
Omar Kashaka Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forest v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03716
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Forest
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN et al
as 0:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Long
Defendant:
D.O.C.-Department of Corrections-MN, Ramsey County Correctional Facility-Workhouse, A.P.S.-Advance Practice Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Segal et al
as 0:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kelly Harper
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal, Susan Brown, Associate Warden Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
