Civil Rights Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 111 - 120 of 20,106
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01317
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Doerflien et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff: Mykell Weaver
Defendant: Lt Dean Doerflien, Sgt William Hane, P.O. Andrew Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Jimica D Phelps
Defendant: Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Banks v. Doe et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant: Scott John Doe, Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff: Darrell J. Smith
Defendant: Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?