Cases 111 - 120 of 1,993
Johnson v. Town of Charlestown et al
as 1:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Irving (Rocky) Johnson
Defendant:
Town of Charlestown, David Westervelt and Earl Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Voccola et al
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ezekial Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph J. Voccola and Joseph J. Voccola and Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Booth v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
REV. WILLIAM BOOTH
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A. and NABEEL BHATTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan et al v. City of Providence et al
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jordan and Shevon L Young
Defendant:
City of Providence, Sean Murnighan, Mark Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
