Cases 121 - 130 of 63,843
McDonald v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv01701
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Stacy McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Contreras v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50381
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Omar G. Contreras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Casillas v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv08666
Plaintiff:
Teresa Casillas
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCorkle v. Martin et al
as 1:2024cv01334
Defendant:
Sheri Martin, Lisa Drapper, . May and others
Plaintiff:
Arnez McCorkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00397
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Tori York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HAWKINS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01636
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GREGORY II v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. GREGORY II
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McAllister v. O'Malley, et al
as 3:2024cv00782
Interested Party:
General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Robert McAllister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Glover v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02709
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Laura Jean Glover
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Butler v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
Steven Butler
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
