Cases 121 - 130 of 208
Larkins et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Robert Steven Larkins and Janice Elaine Larkins
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC , Glenn Peter Acac , Charla Mae Gooch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02633
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee , Correct Care Solutions, LLC , James E. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Washington
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Stephens et al
as 3:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Tyris Brown
Defendant:
Melinda Stephens, Jessica Isom, Glenn Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2012cv02506
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Cortez Lucas
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, White, Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Shelby Co. Jail et al
as 2:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Jail, A.C. Wharton, Mark H. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2012cv02403
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Hughes
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Health Care Services and James E. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Hill et al
as 2:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Pittman
Defendant:
D. Hill, John Delano, A. Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Brooks
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office and Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansour El-Amin v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2012cv00416
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, f/n/u Stewart and M. Stephens
Plaintiff:
Mansour Bin El-Amin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
