Cases 121 - 130 of 359
UAB Game Insight v. John Does 1-7
as 3:2019cv05549
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-7
Plaintiff:
UAB Game Insight
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Fearn v. Miller et al
as 3:2019cv01460
Defendant:
Keith Bruner, Sara Jane del Carmen, Beckie Paquin and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Winningham Fearn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv05320
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections, Manhattan Detention Center, N.Y.C. Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stassi et al
as 3:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, John Doe 1-7 and Brett Stassi
Plaintiff:
Clyde Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn v. McCurrie, et al
as 19-3090
Defendant / Appellee:
DEANE DONLEY, CMII, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in her individual and official capacity, JAMES SKIDMORE, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity, ANDREW LUCHT, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Hampton et al v. Bank Of America, N.A. et al
as 0:2019cv61274
Respondent:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Does 1-7 and Bank Of America, N.A.
Petitioner:
Madelyn Hampton and Edward Winston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2019cv01412
Plaintiff:
Debra V. Wade
Defendant:
Jairo Diaz, Cynthia Mack-Pierce, John Does 4-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez v. Noecker et al
as 1:2019cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rodriguez
Defendant:
Matthew Noecker and John Doe 1-7
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodyguard Productions v. Does 1-7
as 2:2019cv00139
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions
Defendant:
John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Corwell v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv03049
Plaintiff:
Ziare Corwell
Defendant:
LaFonda Spaulding, John Does 1-7 and Westchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
