Cases 121 - 130 of 570
HANSEN v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02604
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., VIFOR (INTERNATIONAL) AG, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JULIE HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carro et al v. Split Rock Resort et al
as 3:2021cv00905
Defendant:
Split Rock Resort d/b/a Split Rock, Split Rock Development, LLC, Stabilis Split Rock JV, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Julie Carro and Joseph Carro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv01666
Defendant:
CPL. JULIE HOWERY and GLASSBORO POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff:
GARY D. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CICCOTELLI v. TCF FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01205
Defendant:
DAVID T PROVOST, ARTHUR A WEISS, VANCE K OPPERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BODDY v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2021cv01183
Defendant:
AHMED SMITH, DIANE SIMMONS, LINDA SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BODDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. CENTRAL OUTREACH et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
JULIE MINCH, CENTRAL OUTREACH and DR. STACY LANE
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DARRUP v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. and Walmart Supercenter #2481
Plaintiff:
Julie Darrup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DARRUP v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 4:2021cv00314
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P., Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. and Walmart Supercenter #2481
Plaintiff:
Julie Darrup
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BURGOS v. KUZO
as 5:2020cv06421
Plaintiff:
ROSA BURGOS
Defendant:
JULIE KUZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
