Cases 121 - 130 of 341
KNORR v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2017cv01391
Plaintiff:
DEREK KNORR
Defendant:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v. HUMPHREY
as 1:2017cv00850
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DAVID HUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MCKINNIES
as 1:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARK MCKINNIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEOPOLD et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
JASON LEOPOLD and RYAN NOAH SHAPIRO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BRASKEM S.A.
as 1:2016cv02488
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
BRASKEM S.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PANOS et al
as 1:2016cv02473
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
EDWARD F. PANOS and ALLISON G. PANOS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RPM INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01803
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
RPM INTERNATIONAL, INC. and EDWARD W. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PANOS et al
as 1:2016mc01827
Petitioner:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Respondent:
EDWARD F. PANOS, ALLISON PANOS, PANOS INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT FUND and others
Cause Of Action: Application: Order Show Cause for Non-Enforcement Subpoena
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JONES
as 1:2016cv01695
Defendant:
MICHAEL ANDRE JONES
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
