Cases 121 - 130 of 289
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OBERFRANZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2017cv02835
Plaintiff:
MONIKA OBERFRANZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2017cv02176
Plaintiff:
JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HEANEY v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
HUNTER HEANEY
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WILLIS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2017cv01742
Plaintiff:
CALLEN WILLIS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv01552
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDWAY et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2017cv01433
Plaintiff:
DAN HARDWAY , EDWIN LOPEZ and G. ROBERT BLAKEY
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT , NOAH SHACHTMAN and SPENCER ACKERMAN
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MONTGOMERY et al v. COMEY et al
as 1:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN and DENNIS MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION , MICHAEL S. ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRANCH v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2017cv00971
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE A BRANCH, III
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, YMCA OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
