Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 161
DOW, et al v. State of Idaho, et al
as 10-35885
Plaintiff - Appellee: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant: KEN SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director, ROWAN GOULD, Acting U.S. fish and Wildlife Service Director and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO and C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER, Governor of Idaho
Intervenor-Defendant: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, SPORTSMEN FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE, MONTANA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
Hells Canyon Preservation Council et al v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00759
Defendant: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and David E. Williams
Plaintiff: Cascadia Wildlands, Center for Biological Diversity, Hells Canyon Preservation Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Greenpeace, Inc., et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35567
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREENPEACE, INC. and CASCADIA WILDLANDS PROJECT
Defendant - Appellee: FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor, BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.D. Department of Agriculture
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. USFS, et al
as 10-35232
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, GREENPEACE and CASCADIA WILDLANDS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, US Department of Agriculture, FORREST COLE, Tongass National Forest Supervisor and BETH PENDLETON, Alaska Regional Forester
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: VIKING LUMBER COMPANY, INC., ALASKA FOREST ASSOCIATION, CITY OF COFFMAN COVE, ALASKA and others
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35155
Plaintiff - Appellee: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellant: FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Tongass Conservation Society et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2010cv00006
Plaintiff: Tongass Conservation Society, Greenpeace and Cascadia Wildlands
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Forrest Cole and Ruth Monahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Organized Village of Kake et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00023
Plaintiff: Organized Village of Kake, Organized Village of Kake, The Boat Company and others
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Goat Ranchers of Oregon, et al v. David Williams, et al
as 09-35541
Plaintiff - Appellant: GOAT RANCHERS OF OREGON, an unincorporated association doing business in Oregon, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, BIG WILDLIFE, an Oregon nonprofit organization and others
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID E. WILLIAMS, in his capacity as Oregon Wildlife Services State Director, Wildlife Services/USDA Animal and Plant Health and USDA ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS)
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Salazar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2009cv00077
Plaintiff: Defenders of Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant: Ken Salazar, Rowan Gould and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Type: Other Statutes None
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 09-35451
Plaintiff - Appellant: TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee: FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?