Cases 131 - 140 of 20,643
Fredricks v. May et al
as 9:2024cv00719
Defendant:
John Doe Correction Officer and C. May
Plaintiff:
Nigel Fredricks and Nigel Fredericks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karupaiyan v. State of New York
as 24-1899
Defendant:
FREDERICK DSOUZA, JOHN DOES-POLICE OFFICERS OF THE NYPD, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Stampone #713769 v. Parnall Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Defendant:
J. Hartwig, Heidi Washington, Unknown Rateman and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCollough v. Williams
as 3:2024cv03849
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jayvon McCollough
Defendant:
Frederick Brice Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
FREDERICK v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Defendant:
G ENGLISH, R HOWELL and L MURPHY
Plaintiff:
QUINTON FREDERICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Arkansas Insurance Department
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tarber v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv02619
Defendant:
Bridgette Hays, Craig Schmidt, Frederick L Gooden and others
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE TARBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Lizotte
as 24-1636
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. PERRY
Respondent:
KEN LIZOTTE, Superintendent for MCI-Norfolk and NELSON ALVES
Luster v. Moussa et al
as 2:2024cv00628
Defendant:
Frederick Hink, Ramy Moussa, Christopher Mocci and others
Plaintiff:
Sammy Devontae Luster, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00826
Petitioner:
Frederick Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
