Cases 131 - 140 of 179
Henderson v. Riley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2009cv00374
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Richard Allen, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Walter Charles Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 3:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
David Steven Johnson
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Horton v. Jones et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
Roderick L. Horton
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riley v. Jones et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Riley
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Troy King and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00246
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Bullock County Correctional Facility, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Kenneth Jones, Warden Mason and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Givan v. Jones et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Saquaski Markese Givan
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Giles v. Jones et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00980
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Giles
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Richard Allen, Dr. Siddiq and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fenn v. Lewis Trucking Company et al
as 2:2008cv00989
Plaintiff:
Annette Fenn, Annette Fenn and Annette Fenn
Defendant:
Lewis Trucking Company, Andrew David Carter, Jr., Swift Transportation Co. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
