Cases 131 - 140 of 563,970
Bushere v. BFQ LLC et al
as 4:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
Lorie Bushere
Defendant:
BFQ LLC and M/V Barefoot Queen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Muhammad v. USA
as 4:2024cv02262
Petitioner:
Rasheed Abdullah Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glover v. Brian Sterling
as 6:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Wallace Glover
Defendant:
Director Brian P Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ousley v. Coastal Pure Beverages, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ousley
Defendant:
Coastal Pure Beverages, LLC, Silver Screening Bottling Co. d/b/a Coastal Pure Beverages, Christopher Brett Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conry et al
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Thomas Conry, Kelsey Daker, Hailey Ronayne and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Perrigo Company PLC, L. Perrigo Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
