Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 220
Michael Smith v. British Petroleum We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-12031
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL HENRY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee: BRITISH PETROLEUM
: SERVICE
Glasgow v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00081
Plaintiff: Michael Henri; Glasgow
Defendant: Stephen E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02702
Plaintiff: Michael Henry
Defendant: Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Davis v. Shapiro, Van Ess & Sherman LLP et al
as 4:2012cv00100
Plaintiff: Travis N Davis
Defendant: Shapiro, Van Ess & Sherman LLP, HTIG Investment Roth IRA LLC and Michael Henry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Henry Baylor v. Michael J Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv10158
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff: Michael Henry Baylor
In re: Michael H. Ditton
as 11-80284
Respondent: In re: MICHAEL HENRY DITTON, Esquire, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: November 2, 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00741
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00719
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?