Cases 181 - 190 of 416
Wright v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Keith Wright
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Marathon Development, Inc. and PAR Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Moore v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Sammie Moore
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Daniel Thomas, Corizon Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02682
Plaintiff:
Mabel Katherine Jones and Kenneth Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones-El v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2013cv04043
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Tom Clements, Mariann Atwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Helmar Christopher Olson
Defendant:
Bobby Taylor, David Taylor, Donald Grindstoff and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, Tom Clements, Mariann B. Atwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wallace
as 4:2013cv00085
Petitioner:
Eugene Kenneth Jones
Respondent:
Ian Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Banks
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Taylor et al
as 5:2012ct03247
Plaintiff:
Helmar Christopher Olson
Defendant:
Bobby Taylor, David Taylor, Donald Grindstoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Sergenant et al
as 1:2012cv10027
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Sergenant, Supervisor 1 and Supervisor 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
