Cases 181 - 190 of 331
Michelle Nemphos v. Nestle Waters North America
as 13-2146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE NEMPHOS, as Legal Guardian for C.G.N., a Minor under the age of Eighteen
Defendant - Appellee:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC., NESTLE USA, INC., THE DANNON COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Nestle USA, Inc. v. Gunther Grant, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06754
Defendant:
Does, Got Chocolates, Inc. and Gunther Grant, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Maritza Pelayo v. Nestle USA Inc et al
as 2:2013cv05213
Defendant:
Buitoni North America Inc, Nestle Prepared Foods Company Inc and Nestle USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Maritza Pelayo
Stuart et al v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02448
Plaintiff:
Chad Stuart and Jeremy Clyde
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc., Wieden + Kennedy, Inc. and Future Noise Music, Limited
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv11934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Fuller v. Nestle USA, Inc.
as 5:2013cv05072
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fuller
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Simpson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Katie Simpson
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. and Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Chocolate Confectionary, et al, et al
as 12-8115
Plaintiff - Respondent:
LORAIN NOVELTY COMPANY, INC, PITCO FOODS, JONES VENDING AND OCS DISTRIBUTING and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
HERSHEY CO, HERSHEY CANADA INC, MARS INC and others
Defendant - Respondent:
NESTLE SA, RP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
