Cases 11 - 20 of 300
Elburki v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki, Kamel M. Elburki and Kamel M Elbarki
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners, David Kenner, Mathew Vaccaro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Peery v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tina Dawn Peery
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
McCoy v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04016
Plaintiff:
Dawn A. McCoy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Koenig v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Koenig, Jr.
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Centurion, Bryan Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
Teresa Dawn Hall
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weber v. USA
as 2:2023cv04156
Plaintiff:
Gayla Dawn Weber
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Strickland v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Kevin Strickland
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Mark Tolbert, Cathy Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carnes v. Blehm et al
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Keith Carnes
Defendant:
Robert Blehm, Ed Begley, Vernon Huth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
