Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 11 - 20 of 116
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
School District No. 15, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01693
Plaintiff: School District No. 15, Marion County, Oregon and North Marion School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 30J v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01695
Plaintiff: School District No. 30J and Willamina School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 91, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01686
Plaintiff: School District No. 91, Marion County, Oregon and Mt. Angel School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 1, Yamhill County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01687
Plaintiff: School District No. 1, Yamhill County, Oregon and Yamhill-Carlton School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 45, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01683
Plaintiff: School District No. 45, Marion County, Oregon and St. Paul School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 5, Marion County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01670
Plaintiff: School District No. 5, Marion County, Oregon and Cascade School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 40, Yamhill County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01671
Plaintiff: School District No. 40, Yamhill County, Oregon and McMinnville School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kishna v. Hud at: Washington DC, Oregon, Portland Seattle Washington State. Washington County, Hillsboro 97123/4 et al
as 3:2022cv01673
Plaintiff: Anita Kishna
Defendant: Hud at: Washington DC, Oregon, Portland Seattle Washington State. Washington County, Hillsboro 97123/4, Hud, Washington DC, Persons in Charge Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
School District No. 2J, Deschutes County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01672
Plaintiff: School District No. 2J, Deschutes County, Oregon and Redmond School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
School District No. 48J, Yamhill County, Oregon v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01666
Plaintiff: School District No. 48J, Yamhill County, Oregon and Sheridan School District
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?