Cases 11 - 20 of 608
Clayborne v. Basaldua et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bianca Clayborne
Defendant:
Ruben Basaldua, Donnie Clark, Douglas Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Datrin Travis
Defendant:
Sarah-Ann Williams, Chief T. Conrad, A. Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guess v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Rachel Dianna Guess
Respondent:
Robert H. Fleming, Jr., Samuel Fleming, Douglas R Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Vernon v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Douglas Vernon and Douglas Vernon Mashek
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Douglas v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Reco Recardo Douglas
Defendant:
John Doe, Bobby Jones, Steve Godwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Phillips et al
as 3:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Mathis
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon v. Halsey et al
as 3:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Douglas Vernon
Defendant:
Nicolas Halsey, John Doe One, John Doe Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hills v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Lane Douglas Hills
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland and Maury County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01163
Petitioner:
Chavis Douglas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
