Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Bersuch et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00789
Plaintiff:
Abigayle Abel, Daniel Adams, Jim Adams and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Armenta et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00779
Plaintiff:
Francisco Armenta, Kenneth Barnes, Mark Brown and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Gomes v. Meza et al
as 5:2017cv00560
Defendant:
Daniel Armenta and Marcelo M. Meza
Plaintiff:
Monique Gomes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Soto Leos et al
as 7:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Isaias Rodriguez
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Soto Leos and Salvador Garces Brida Armenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Armenta
as 3:2017cv00515
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rigo Armenta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Armenta v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2016cv03522
Plaintiff:
John Armenta
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Depuy International Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armenta et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 7:2016cv00428
Plaintiff:
Joel Armenta and Adelita Armenta
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armenta v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv03115
Petitioner:
Frank Armenta
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armenta v. Stephens
as 2:2014cv00445
Petitioner:
Frank Armenta
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armenta et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 3:2012cv01954
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Armenta and Irene R. Armenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
