Cases 11 - 20 of 943
STEWART v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00029
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HOLLAND v. ASTRUE
as 3:2013cv00013
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOLLAND
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SORRELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00116
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JADA D. SORRELS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
WELCH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00103
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ZULA M. WELCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BROWNING v. ASTRUE
as 3:2013cv00008
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
HEATHER BROWNING
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ELLIOT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00090
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE E. ELLIOT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCOTT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00091
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
TRENA N. SCOTT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
REIGER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00022
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
SABRINA L. REIGER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
DANIELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00027
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
CALVIN L. DANIELS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
HAWKINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00019
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
DORIEN A. HAWKINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
