Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Bank of the Ozarks v. Boatright
as 2:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Bank of the Ozarks
Defendant:
W. Neal Boatright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04354
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baker v. Boatright et al
as 5:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Julius S. Baker, Sr.
Defendant:
Mike Boatright and Julie Lord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Boatright et al
as 4:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Boyd
Defendant:
Christoph Boatright, C. Boatright and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acker v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00377
Plaintiff:
Deborah Acker, Zipporah Acklin, Jamie Seals and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Blanche Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boatright v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00085
Plaintiff:
Teresa Boatright
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. and James Bolfilk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walsh v. Jeff Davis County et al
as 2:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Mike Walsh
Defendant:
Jeff Davis County, James Laddie Boatright, Jr., Richard Deas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tanner v. Bacon County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
John R. Tanner and John R. Tanner
Defendant:
Bacon County Board of Commissioners, Bacon County Development Authority and Roger Boatright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tanner v. Bacon County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
John R. Tanner
Defendant:
Bacon County Board of Commissioners, Bacon County Development Authority and Roger Boatright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Boatright v. Astrue
as 5:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Alicia Boatright
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
