Cases 11 - 20 of 24
King v. Holder et al
as 5:2014ct03062
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Charles Ratledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardison v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2014hc02017
Petitioner:
Charles Leroy Hardison
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ofarrit-Figueroa v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03283
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ofarrit-Figueroa
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Kathleen Sibileus, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03268
Plaintiff:
Randle Cooke
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Kathleen Sibileus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rojas-Guzman v. Samuels et al
as 5:2013hc02219
Petitioner:
Carlos Elmer Rojas-Guzman
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03232
Plaintiff:
Anton Johnson
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Kathleen Sibileus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03179
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. King
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Kathleen Sibileus, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Florez v. Holder et al
as 5:2013ct03162
Plaintiff:
Raymond Florez
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Craig Apker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2013ct03052
Plaintiff:
Arthur Eugene Byrd
Defendant:
Unicor Employee Hamilton, Administrator Henry and Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. Holder et al
as 5:2012ct03245
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Jonathan C. Miner, Brick Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
