Cases 11 - 20 of 271
LINDSAY et al v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER H. LINDSAY, JR. and CHARLES R. BLACKBURN
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, ROBERT RIPP and others
ROSARIO v. HILDEBRAND et al
as 5:2020cv00540
Defendant:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES CORPORATION, ESTES EXPRESS LINES and CHARLES R. HILDEBRAND
Plaintiff:
ADOLFO A. ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SAUNDERS v. RALEIGH COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
CHARLES R. HUMPHREY, THEE HONORABLE ADAM DIMLICH, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atiyeh et al v. Borough of Gettysburg et al
as 1:2019cv01412
Defendant:
Susan Naugle, John Lawver, Borough of Gettysburg and others
Plaintiff:
Gettysburg Investors LLC, Jamilie Abraham LLC, Gallery 30 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAMLICH v. CHARLES R. BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL COMPANY, LLC
as 5:2019cv00906
Plaintiff:
LEONARD KRAMLICH
Defendant:
CHARLES R. BLOSENSKI DISPOSAL COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Blanchard et al
as 2:2018cv02752
Defendant:
Charles R Bridges, Jr., Bryan Blanchard, Howard L. Haber and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEERLESS SPECIALTY FLOORING, LLC et al v. STANLEY STEPHENS CO., INC.
as 2:2018mc00144
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
STANLEY STEPHENS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
PRATER v. FRYE et al
as 2:2018cv01774
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
FRYE, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRATER v. GROSSMAN et al
as 2:2018cv01526
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CHARLES R. GROSSMAN, SR., JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
