Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Payne v. Butts et al
as 3:2021cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Payne
Defendant:
Charles Butts, Crig Copper, Margaret Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wilkins v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Scott W. Walters, John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPPER v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-GREENE et al
as 2:2018cv04577
Petitioner:
TYREESE COPPER
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-GREENE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COPPER v. MOTORIST INSURANCE GROUP
as 2:2018cv01184
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COPPER
Defendant:
MOTORIST INSURANCE GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPPER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00753
Plaintiff:
THEODORE JOHN COPPER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LANDMAN v. CRAY YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01661
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. LANDMAN
Defendant:
CRAY YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, INC. and DAVID COPPER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Benfield Electric Co., Inc. v. Classic Communities Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Benfield Electric Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Classic Communities Corporation, Classic at Copper Ridge LP, Classic at Summerfield, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
BOSH v. ANSONIA COPPER & BRASS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01699
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A. BOSH
Defendant:
ANSONIA COPPER & BRASS, INC., ANSONIA SPECIALTY METALS, LLC, BWM METALS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
