Cases 11 - 20 of 371
Steven D. Phillips v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03342
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, BASF Corporation, Clariant Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Phillips v. South Bend Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
South Bend Indiana, Indiana The State of, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03189
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steven D. Phillips v. 3M Company et al
as SC/2:24-cv-03342
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Phillips
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Rivas v. Bryan D. Phillips
as 2:2024cv03231
Petitioner:
Anthony Rivas
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris
as 5:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
John Doe, Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips, Hollandberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Holland
as 1:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
Dezzan D. Phillips
Defendant:
Scott T. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
