Cases 11 - 20 of 466
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv02806
Plaintiff:
HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER CONCORD, JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER WALNUT CREEK and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02731
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY L. DAVIS and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ROBERT ANTHONY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
NASA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023mc00089
Plaintiff:
NASA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and PARTNERSHIP FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant:
BRITTANY DAVIS
Garnishee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
