Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Savani et al v. Jaddou et al
as 4:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Giancarlo Savani and Annapia Rancanelli
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Texas Service Center U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Karl Brasil v. Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 21-11984
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ACTING DIRECTOR, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ACTING SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARL JUSTA BRASIL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01553
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
