Cases 11 - 20 of 4,045
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Tinsley v. Glaude
as 3:2024cv05673
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Tinsley
Defendant:
Donald Glaude and Donald Mack Glaude
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Montes et al v. Capital One, National Association
as 4:2024cv05677
Defendant:
Capital One, National Association
Plaintiff:
Omar Montes, Brandon Masjedian and Donald Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Powell v. Segerstrom et al
as 1:2024cv00969
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, The Federal Judicial Judges, Richard Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Christopher Todd Ruschhaupt v. The U.S. District Court Magistrate et al
as 2:2024cv07014
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Magistrate, President Joe Biden, Former President Donald Trump and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Ruschhaupt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardell-Smith v. Glaude
as 3:2024cv05198
Defendant:
Donald Glaude
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ardell-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Donald Cancinos v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 2:2024cv06902
Plaintiff:
Donald Cancinos
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
