Cases 11 - 20 of 66
BEAL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. BEAL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, RICHARD BOWER and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF PENNSLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICKER v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
DAVID EDWARD RICKER
Respondent:
L. J. ESTOCK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POPOTE v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv04773
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, JOSH SHAPIRO, JOHN T. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POPOTE v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv04773
Petitioner:
RAFAEL MUESES POPOTE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LEE ESTOCK, JOSH SHAPIRO and JOHN T. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PURNELL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv04050
Petitioner:
SHERON JALEN PURNELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEAVER v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv03872
Petitioner:
LOVELLE WEAVER
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ORTIZ v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
MACKENNETH ORTIZ
Defendant:
LEE ESTOCK, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT YINGLING and SCI P.N.G. MEDICAL DEPT. ADMIN. (WELLPATH)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
DeKeyser v. Estock et al
as 1:2022cv00587
Petitioner:
Zhaire N. DeKeyser
Respondent:
Superintendent Estock and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00346
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER FREEMAN
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
JEROME KING
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
