Cases 11 - 20 of 5,420
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv09295
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX and WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
RYAN SHEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arroyave-Ramirez v. FCI Otisville
as 1:2024cv06985
Respondent:
Warden FCI Otisville
Petitioner:
Andres Fernando Arroyave-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McKinney v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01328
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Petitioner:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VALENCIA-PENA
as 2:2024cv09266
Petitioner:
LUIS ANGEL VALENCIA-PENA
Respondent:
FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berrios-Osorto v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Olvyn Abilo Berrios-Osorto
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bustos-Cruz v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00378
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Bustos-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farmer v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00503
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
Gerald E. Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ali v. FCI Pollock
as 1:2024cv04059
Petitioner:
Muzammil Ali
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
