Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Hardies Fruit and Vegetable Company-Houston, LP et al v. Black Titan Franchise Systems LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
HARDIES FRUIT AND VEGETABLE COMPANY-HOUSTON, LP, OLE TYME PRODUCE, INC and STERN PRODUCE COMPANY
Defendant:
BLACK TITAN FRANCHISE SYSTEMS LLC, BLACK TITAN HOLDINGS AZ, L.L.C., BLACK TITAN HOLDINGS MO, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Houston v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Houston
Defendant:
United States of America
Belt v. Authorize.Net et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Defendant:
PaySafe.com also known as PaySafe:Group doing business as Houston Risk Review, Authorize.Net and PaySafe
Plaintiff:
Ty Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Money v. King
as 5:2022hc02132
Petitioner:
Chad Houston Money
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Houston Casualty Company v. Dixie Lawn Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Company
Defendant:
Dixie Lawn Service, Inc. and Vincent Bryan McCullough
The Cato Corporation, et al v. Houston Salem, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00466
Plaintiff:
The Cato Corporation and CHW, LLC
Defendant:
Houston Salem, Inc.
The Cato Corporation v. CHW, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
The Cato Corporation
Defendant:
CHW, LLC and Houston Salem, Inc.
Smith v. Town of Cramerton et al
as 3:2018cv00631
Defendant:
Demetrios Koutsoupias, Susan Neeley, David Pugh and others
Plaintiff:
Randall Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Houston Baptist University
as 5:2017cv00629
Plaintiff:
Deanna Hicks
Defendant:
Houston Baptist University
Cause Of Action: 47*
Houston et al v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
David R. Houston, Catherine Ashley Kopp and Sandra Abbott Lange
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
